Corsair RM1000e (2023) Gen5 PSU Review

Load Regulation

Test 12V 5V 3.3V 5VSB DC/AC (Watts) Efficiency Fan Speed (RPM) PSU Noise (dB[A]) Temps (In/Out) PF/AC Volts
10% 6.440A 2.008A 1.989A 0.999A 100.002 86.785% 876 20.6 35.51C 0.965
12.176V 4.981V 3.318V 5.005V 115.226 39.76C 115.13V
20% 13.930A 3.013A 2.984A 1.201A 199.947 91.613% 871 20.4 35.88C 0.976
12.135V 4.979V 3.317V 4.996V 218.25 40.41C 115.1V
30% 21.769A 3.52A 3.484A 1.403A 300 92.113% 874 20.5 36.55C 0.98
12.125V 4.973V 3.315V 4.989V 325.687 41.40C 115.07V
40% 29.592A 4.026A 3.984A 1.606A 399.696 92.141% 874 20.5 36.74C 0.982
12.115V 4.969V 3.313V 4.981V 433.787 41.76C 115.05V
50% 37.084A 5.034A 4.982A 1.81A 499.463 91.776% 918 22.1 36.85C 0.984
12.106V 4.967V 3.312V 4.973V 544.222 42.31C 115.02V
60% 44.656A 6.046A 5.983A 2A 599.906 91.226% 995 24.2 37.33C 0.987
12.096V 4.963V 3.31V 4.965V 657.609 43.35C 114.99V
70% 52.169A 7.058A 6.983A 2.219A 699.717 90.55% 1115 27.5 37.85C 0.989
12.088V 4.96V 3.308V 4.957V 772.746 45.41C 114.97V
80% 59.765A 8.002A 7.984A 2.323A 799.413 89.771% 1194 29.8 38.02C 0.991
12.078V 4.956V 3.306V 4.951V 890.506 46.26C 114.94V
90% 67.700A 8.582A 8.471A 2.427A 899.547 88.947% 1316 32.8 39.21C 0.992
12.069V 4.952V 3.305V 4.945V 1011.328 48.41C 114.91V
100% 75.453A 9.095A 8.99A 3.043A 999.572 87.981% 1583 37.6 39.75C 0.993
12.059V 4.948V 3.303V 4.929V 1136.127 49.81C 114.88V
110% 83.157A 10.115A 10.086A 3.046A 1100.181 86.844% 1952 42.9 40.64C 0.994
12.048V 4.943V 3.301V 4.925V 1266.864 51.49C 114.86V
CL1 0.115A 18.126A 18.019A 0A 151.299 82.862% 1091 26.8 36.75C 0.976
12.142V 4.982V 3.308V 5.007V 182.59 42.28C 115.11V
CL2 0.115A 20.023A 0A 0A 101.395 81.4% 938 22.7 37.11C 0.966
12.184V 4.994V 3.312V 5.025V 124.567 43.26C 115.12V
CL3 0.114A 0A 19.894A 0A 67.384 75.131% 878 20.7 38.25C 0.947
12.173V 4.98V 3.317V 5.009V 89.689 45.26C 115.13V
CL4 82.895A 0A 0A 0A 1000.093 88.832% 1346 33.1 39.51C 0.993
12.064V 4.95V 3.31V 4.995V 1125.822 47.48C 114.89V

Load regulation is satisfactory, in general.

Ripple Suppression

Test 12V 5V 3.3V 5VSB Pass/Fail
10% Load 11.1 mV 9.6 mV 7.8 mV 7.0 mV Pass
20% Load 16.5 mV 10.0 mV 8.3 mV 9.9 mV Pass
30% Load 13.7 mV 10.8 mV 9.7 mV 9.0 mV Pass
40% Load 12.7 mV 11.5 mV 8.9 mV 8.5 mV Pass
50% Load 11.6 mV 12.4 mV 9.4 mV 9.0 mV Pass
60% Load 13.7 mV 13.4 mV 10.6 mV 10.2 mV Pass
70% Load 14.9 mV 14.7 mV 13.1 mV 11.8 mV Pass
80% Load 14.7 mV 15.1 mV 16.8 mV 11.8 mV Pass
90% Load 15.6 mV 16.2 mV 16.8 mV 12.6 mV Pass
100% Load 24.6 mV 18.4 mV 19.0 mV 15.6 mV Pass
110% Load 25.7 mV 19.9 mV 19.8 mV 17.1 mV Pass
Crossload 1 27.3 mV 17.9 mV 26.7 mV 14.5 mV Pass
Crossload 2 13.3 mV 13.7 mV 11.7 mV 9.5 mV Pass
Crossload 3 12.0 mV 12.4 mV 20.3 mV 9.3 mV Pass
Crossload 4 23.9 mV 15.2 mV 13.0 mV 12.0 mV Pass

Ripple suppression is good on all rails.

Pages ( 4 of 11 ): « Previous123 4 567891011Next »

Related Posts

8 thoughts on “Corsair RM1000e (2023) Gen5 PSU Review

  1. I’ve noticed quite a few reviews of this PSU, both online and one person I know personally, which have reported really bad coil whine issues just by turning the PSU on. I’m wondering if there was a large bad batch that went out and the rest are fine or if this is a bigger problem. Regardless, I’m really glad to see a slightly more budget series from corsair to slip between their cxm and rmx series assuming this coil whine issue isn’t widespread.

    1. This is a new product, just got released, so you probably refer to the previous RMe. We didn’t notice any strange issues in our tests, and we have tested almost a dozen different RMe models.

  2. Hello Aris,
    The soldering it’s bad as it can be. Off centered and off axis SMD, cold joints and manual soldering for some parts. High Power parts with half the flux.
    You call this “Average soldering quality”? This thing it’s a fire hazard waiting to happen.
    BTW can you give an example of bad soldering in your reviews?

    1. Hi there! This unit is a fire-hazard? It passed hours of testing under the toughest possible condition without breaking or creating any issues.
      Where did you see cold joints? If a joint is cold, the unit wouldn’t work at the first place.

      Believe me this is average to my eyes. For me notably problems are mostly long component leads which can create shorts and when solder is missing, creating poor connections and increased resistance.

      This is bad soldering example: https://www.techpowerup.com/review/xigmatek-maverick-s-500/4.html

      1. The manual soldering done on some SMD parts point me to this cold joints issue, if the QC misses one then here you go.
        Also too little flux for the FET’s could lead in time to a crack. Those parts get thermal cycle all day long.
        Remember the we don’t buy PSU’s for 1-2 years.

        Yeah the example is real bad, thanks for sharing.
        Keep up the good work man.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *