Epilogue
The Thermaltake PT 1000 scores higher in its category than its 1200W sibling. Moreover, I noticed that in the 1000W model, the 3.3V rail performed much better than in the 1200W model, boosting the PSU’s overall performance a bit. Additionally, the 12V rail’s performance was better in the high-load transient response tests, because the peak load was 2000W, whereas in the flagship unit it was 400W higher. I should remind you that both models use the same type and number of FETs to regulate the 12V rail, which sounds weird. Apparently, the production cost of replacing the FETs in the 1000W model with different ones was higher than keeping the same ones.
- Thermaltake Toughpower PT 1200 ATX v3.1 PSU Review
- Thermaltake Toughpower PT 1000 ATX v3.1 PSU Review
- Thermaltake Toughpower PT 850 ATX v3.1 PSU Review
The 3.3V rail’s transient performance remains mediocre, but at least the 1000W model didn’t fail in the tests I conducted with normal loads, unlike the 1200W unit. On the other hand, CWT used lower-capacity bulk caps on the 1000W platform, limiting hold-up time to below 17ms. Although it still meets the ATX v3.1 spec’s corresponding requirement, I still want to see a hold-up time exceeding 17ms. Additionally, ripple suppression is good, vampire power is dead low, and the platform’s efficiency across all load ranges is high enough. After all, this is a Platinum-certified unit in the strict Cybenetics scale. Finally, a great advantage of the Thermaltake PT 1000 is the fact that it is among the quietest PSUs in the 1000W category.
I left the protection features for last, which are correctly set in this unit. Although the differences between normal and high temperatures in the OCP triggering points of the minor rails are small, they remain highly conservative so that I won’t mark this as a con. I don’t often evaluate PSUs with properly tuned protection features, and this is one of the reasons I will recommend this unit.
All in all, the Thermaltake PT 1000 offers decent overall performance, and its protection features are correctly configured, which is a significant asset. If only it also had fan failure protection, which is nowhere to be found in most desktop PSUs.
Before investing in a new power supply, read my article on the Best ATX v3.x PSUs to compare all alternative PSU offerings. You help me a lot by using my affiliate links, which don’t increase the price of the product. I receive a commission from Amazon every time you do it, which can make a significant difference for me, especially now that I am working independently, exclusively for my media, rather than for someone else.
- Delivered full power at 47°C
- ATX v3.1 and PCIe CEM 5.1 compliant
- Cybenetics Platinum rated
- Silent operation (Cybenetics A+)
- Properly set OCP and OPP triggering points
- High enough efficiency on all load ranges
- High PF readings, especially at 230V
- Efficient 5VSB rail
- Low vampire power
- Quality capacitors used
- Tight enough load regulation
- Good ripple suppression
- Alternative Low Power Mode (ALPM) compatible
- 135mm Fluid Dynamic Bearing fan of decent quality
- 12+4-pin PCIe connector set at 600W
- Transient response could be better at 12V (high loads)
- Increased combined loads on the minor rails (>106W) notably affect fan speed
- Lower than 17ms hold-up time
- Increased inrush currents
- No fan failure protection


Here cybenetics reports
850w which is not very good
https://www.cybenetics.com/evaluations/psus/2580/
1000w Malfunctioning protections that don’t engage in time before the minor rails experience a huge voltage drop out of spec.
https://www.cybenetics.com/evaluations/psus/2575/
Basically i wouldnt do none of these
Any chance for review Thermaltake SFX ATX 3.1 ?
If we have it in our database sure.