Thermaltake Toughpower PF3 1050W PSU Review

Load Regulation

Test 12V 5V 3.3V 5VSB DC/AC (Watts) Efficiency Fan Speed (RPM) PSU Noise (dB[A]) Temps (In/Out) PF/AC Volts
10% 6.957A 1.995A 1.986A 0.98A 104.932 88.987% 0 <6.0 44.39C 0.961
11.980V 5.012V 3.323V 5.101V 117.917 40.17C 114.84V
20% 14.932A 2.994A 2.982A 1.178A 209.915 92.155% 0 <6.0 45.32C 0.977
11.988V 5.01V 3.32V 5.092V 227.784 40.70C 114.8V
30% 23.238A 3.495A 3.482A 1.377A 314.929 92.615% 0 <6.0 46.63C 0.982
12.001V 5.008V 3.317V 5.083V 340.04 41.63C 114.76V
40% 31.499A 3.996A 3.983A 1.577A 419.52 92.491% 1206 28.3 41.82C 0.984
12.011V 5.006V 3.314V 5.074V 453.576 47.33C 114.72V
50% 39.472A 4.997A 4.983A 1.777A 524.874 92.118% 1203 28.2 42.09C 0.984
12.018V 5.003V 3.311V 5.065V 569.782 48.13C 114.69V
60% 47.366A 6A 5.985A 1.978A 629.369 91.665% 1200 28.2 42.56C 0.986
12.024V 5V 3.309V 5.056V 686.593 49.07C 114.65V
70% 55.211A 7.004A 6.989A 2.179A 734.7 90.652% 1878 41.1 43.13C 0.987
12.055V 4.998V 3.306V 5.047V 810.459 50.17C 114.6V
80% 63.117A 8.001A 7.994A 2.282A 839.471 90.025% 1877 41.1 43.59C 0.988
12.066V 4.995V 3.302V 5.039V 932.491 51.57C 114.57V
90% 71.417A 8.51A 8.485A 2.384A 944.891 89.324% 1875 41.1 44.31C 0.99
12.076V 4.994V 3.3V 5.032V 1057.819 53.23C 114.52V
100% 79.442A 9.013A 9.008A 2.989A 1049.7 88.43% 1874 41.1 45.60C 0.991
12.085V 4.992V 3.297V 5.017V 1187.044 55.33C 114.47V
110% 87.348A 10.02A 10.11A 2.993A 1154.317 87.488% 2241 45.1 46.69C 0.991
12.090V 4.99V 3.293V 5.012V 1319.415 57.51C 114.43V
CL1 0.116A 12.039A 11.976A 0A 101.287 85.073% 1211 28.3 40.13C 0.961
11.994V 5V 3.315V 5.115V 119.06 54.40C 114.83V
CL2 0.115A 20.013A 0A 0A 101.348 83.672% 1215 28.3 40.91C 0.961
11.990V 4.995V 3.324V 5.117V 121.122 50.65C 114.83V
CL3 0.115A 0A 19.935A 0A 67.374 78.953% 1216 28.4 40.61C 0.945
11.981V 5.013V 3.311V 5.114V 85.334 47.72C 114.84V
CL4 86.873A 0A 0A 0.001A 1049.491 89.116% 2243 45.1 45.09C 0.99
12.081V 5.004V 3.306V 5.074V 1177.67 52.75C 114.48V

Load regulation is loose on the 12V rail, while we measured within 1% on the same rail in the 1200W model. We used the same cables and sense pins on both PSUs, so the problem lies entirely on the PSU’s platform. This means that HKC should look closer at the performance variations of its manufacturing lines’ products.

Ripple Suppression

Test 12V 5V 3.3V 5VSB Pass/Fail
10% Load 8.9 mV 7.4 mV 8.7 mV 6.1 mV Pass
20% Load 10.5 mV 21.8 mV 17.6 mV 6.6 mV Pass
30% Load 9.6 mV 7.6 mV 9.9 mV 7.4 mV Pass
40% Load 12.3 mV 7.7 mV 10.6 mV 7.7 mV Pass
50% Load 11.6 mV 8.6 mV 10.9 mV 8.5 mV Pass
60% Load 12.4 mV 8.5 mV 11.3 mV 9.1 mV Pass
70% Load 14.4 mV 9.8 mV 12.8 mV 10.2 mV Pass
80% Load 14.4 mV 9.9 mV 14.3 mV 10.7 mV Pass
90% Load 13.9 mV 10.9 mV 14.9 mV 12.3 mV Pass
100% Load 22.3 mV 11.5 mV 19.2 mV 23.1 mV Pass
110% Load 22.9 mV 13.1 mV 20.5 mV 25.5 mV Pass
Crossload 1 16.3 mV 8.8 mV 11.0 mV 6.1 mV Pass
Crossload 2 12.6 mV 13.5 mV 9.3 mV 5.7 mV Pass
Crossload 3 10.1 mV 7.4 mV 10.3 mV 5.4 mV Pass
Crossload 4 19.9 mV 10.2 mV 19.2 mV 11.4 mV Pass

Ripple suppression is good on all rails.

Pages ( 4 of 11 ): « Previous123 4 567891011Next »

Related Posts

2 thoughts on “Thermaltake Toughpower PF3 1050W PSU Review

  1. Hello,
    I have a strange thing to report about this exact model.
    I thought the fan on the unit I had was dying because of a somewhat scratching noise when disabling smart fan off so I ordered a replacement unit from Amazon

    The replacement unit is totally different from the one that I have. I have uploaded two photos of actual units and their boxes.
    https://photos.app.goo.gl/UaZksh86vbbGtET96

    https://photos.app.goo.gl/CFjRCmtTqseHQDAu6

    My previous unit seems to have the same pcb as in your review, only with two brown Nippon chemicon 470uf instead of your’s black Nichicon.
    The newer unit seems to have:
    – the fan partially wrapped in plastic in order to restrict airflow (I Guess)
    – black thick heatsink similar to those of a cwt puq I had
    – just one black Nichicon with 400v stamped on it and GG (M) (no micro Farad indication that I can get a glimpse of)
    – different main transformer in a black monolith enclosure saying pq4040-a 2316 on it
    – three big nude coils similar to those of PFC (but I am no expert)
    – a fan that is even noisier (it resemble a track) when activated.
    – different advertisement about efficiency and fan curve on the box (see the photo attached)
    – cables pcb is disposed differently

    I can attach a sound print in mp3 of both if needed.

    I thought my fan was already defective but it seems this is even worse in a way. Wich one do you think would be better to keep?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *