Transient Response
20% Load – 20ms
Advanced Transient Response 20% - 50 Hz - No Caps | ||||
Voltage | Before | After | Change | Pass/Fail |
12V | 12.112V | 11.999V | 0.93% | Pass |
5V | 5.099V | 4.993V | 2.08% | Pass |
3.3V | 3.330V | 3.191V | 4.18% | Pass |
5VSB | 5.106V | 5.064V | 0.82% | Pass |
50% Load -20ms
Advanced Transient Response 50% - 50 Hz - No Caps | ||||
Voltage | Before | After | Change | Pass/Fail |
12V | 12.095V | 11.991V | 0.86% | Pass |
5V | 5.089V | 4.976V | 2.23% | Pass |
3.3V | 3.318V | 3.171V | 4.42% | Pass |
5VSB | 5.063V | 5.009V | 1.07% | Pass |
The transient response is good at 12V, average at 5V, and mediocre at 3.3V.
Transient Response ATX v3.1 Tests
The PSU passes all ATX v3.1 transient response tests, but the 12V and 3.3V rails drop low.
The 12V rail’s performance is average in these tests.
Pages:
Are there any better PSUs that include white sleeved cables?
Do we still need to concern about capacitor these days? Especially the japanese one? I read that Nippon-ChemiCon are now produced with Chinese Manufacture like ChengX that now make Rubycon and Nippon-ChemiCon. Does that mean they all now have the same quality?
Chemi-Con uses its own facilities in China, which are up to its standards.
Does Chemicon delegate production to a Chinese company that is not owned by them?
don’t have a clue about this. Will need to check it next time I am in China.
i;m sorry Aris it’s looks like Beryl BC polymer rather than APAQ
thank you, you are right.