Corsair SF1000 ATX v3.1 PSU Review

Transient Response

20% Load – 20ms

Voltage Before After Change Pass/Fail
12V 12.104V 12.039V 0.54% Pass
5V 4.998V 4.914V 1.68% Pass
3.3V 3.331V 3.260V 2.14% Pass
5VSB 5.024V 4.957V 1.34% Pass

50% Load -20ms

Voltage Before After Change Pass/Fail
12V 12.095V 12.023V 0.60% Pass
5V 4.994V 4.910V 1.68% Pass
3.3V 3.326V 3.255V 2.15% Pass
5VSB 5.002V 4.938V 1.29% Pass

The transient response is excellent at 12V, where it matters the most. It is also pretty good on the other rails.

Transient Response ATX v3.1 Tests

The PSU passes all ATX v3.1 transient response tests.

The 12V rail keeps its voltage very high in the 200% load test. Only the SF850 performs better here, but it has a 150W lower capacity, so the applied load is 1700W, while for the SF1000, the transient load is 2000W.

Pages ( 5 of 11 ): « Previous1234 5 67891011Next »

Related Posts

12 thoughts on “Corsair SF1000 ATX v3.1 PSU Review

  1. I’m so glad I found your reviews! One thing you could do to improve your reviews is to include frequency response PSUs (or anything that can emit noise). This would help to visualize if there is nasty coil whine or other undesirable noises coming out of fans/electronics/whatever. I’m asking for this because people have different hearing ability and you might not perceive noises that other people do. Such graph would be an objective measurement and thus easily comparable and outside of our subjective variances in ear hardware 😉

  2. Amazing work with these review articles! I especially like the noise performance graph at various loads, that is extremely helpful for me. Could you please make the affiliate link prominent? I would like to support your testing.

  3. Would you recommend SF1000 over lower wattage models if my average load is around 600W? From the tests, I see it should be quieter at that load, but I wonder if there’s any downside to running this PSU at a half-rated load.

    1. Downside is it will probably pull more power from socket when your computer is idle or your doing light tasks because this is way outside it’s optimal operational efficiency.

  4. Hi aris, thank you very much for the review!. can you elaborate on the OCP triggering points? What are the risks of being set too high? Any risks to other pc componants ?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *