NZXT C1200 ATX v3.1 PSU Review

Efficiency Normal, Light & Super-Light Loads

Compared to the competition, efficiency is low at normal loads and average at light loads. It improves at super-light loads, where the PSU easily passes the 70% mark.

Average Efficiency

The platform’s average efficiency is lower than other 1200W ATX v3.1 units.

Average PF

The APFC converter needs a performance boost at 230V.

Average Efficiency 5VSB

The 5VSB rail is efficient.

Vampire Power

Vampire power is low.

Pages ( 7 of 11 ): « Previous123456 7 891011Next »

Related Posts

5 thoughts on “NZXT C1200 ATX v3.1 PSU Review

  1. Thought I would share my findings.
    Firstly thank you crmaris for the good review based on this I decided to get the NZXT C1200, retiring my Corsair AX1200 (it’s now more than 10 years old). I found that I am using less power now, around 0.5Amps or 115 Watt (@ 230V) less power now, I tested playing the same game for the same period and logging with my Fluke 367FC. I did find that the inrush current is a bit higher at 5.2A, vs the 4.7A my corsair had. But overall super happy.

  2. The difference between the original C1200 and ATX 3.1 version is not just limited to the 12V-2×6 connector. The new version also has one extra PCIe connector, which is good if you have a GPU with three PCIe connectors like the 7900 XTX from AIBs.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *