NZXT C1200 ATX v3.1 PSU Review

Transient Response

20% Load – 20ms

Voltage Before After Change Pass/Fail
12V 12.127V 11.925V 1.67% Pass
5V 5.062V 4.975V 1.71% Pass
3.3V 3.354V 3.247V 3.20% Pass
5VSB 5.029V 4.990V 0.79% Pass

50% Load -20ms

Voltage Before After Change Pass/Fail
12V 12.086V 12.010V 0.63% Pass
5V 5.056V 4.980V 1.51% Pass
3.3V 3.344V 3.232V 3.35% Pass
5VSB 5.004V 4.966V 0.75% Pass

The transient response is good on the minor rails, but the average deviation is high at 12V. The 12V rail has a notable voltage drop in the first transient test (20% load), where the resonant controller seems to operate at PWM mode.

Transient Response ATX v3.1 Tests

The PSU passes all ATX v3.1 transient response tests.

The 12V rail is 0.21V away from the top performer in the 200% transient load test. Of course, a smaller gap would be preferable.

Pages ( 5 of 11 ): « Previous1234 5 67891011Next »

Related Posts

5 thoughts on “NZXT C1200 ATX v3.1 PSU Review

  1. Thought I would share my findings.
    Firstly thank you crmaris for the good review based on this I decided to get the NZXT C1200, retiring my Corsair AX1200 (it’s now more than 10 years old). I found that I am using less power now, around 0.5Amps or 115 Watt (@ 230V) less power now, I tested playing the same game for the same period and logging with my Fluke 367FC. I did find that the inrush current is a bit higher at 5.2A, vs the 4.7A my corsair had. But overall super happy.

  2. The difference between the original C1200 and ATX 3.1 version is not just limited to the 12V-2×6 connector. The new version also has one extra PCIe connector, which is good if you have a GPU with three PCIe connectors like the 7900 XTX from AIBs.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *