Efficiency Normal, Light & Super-Light Loads
Efficiency in power supplies is the percentage of input AC power converted to usable DC power for the system, with the rest lost as heat. For example, an 80% efficient PSU delivering 400W of DC power draws 500W from the AC source, losing 100W as heat.
The average efficiency is high on all load ranges.
Average Efficiency
The PSU’s average efficiency with more than 1450 different load levels at 115V and 230V is depicted in the graphs below.
The average efficiency meets the Cybenetics Platinum criteria.
Average PF
Power factor in power supplies is the ratio of real power (used to do work, measured in watts) to apparent power (total power drawn, measured in volt-amperes). It indicates how efficiently a PSU uses incoming AC power. A higher power factor (closer to 1) is better, as it means less wasted energy, reduced strain on electrical systems, and improved efficiency, often achieved through Active Power Factor Correction (APFC) in modern PSUs.
The APFC converter performs well at 115V and offers decent performance at 230V.
Average Efficiency 5VSB
The 5VSB rail’s efficiency is low.
Vampire Power
Vampire power, also known as standby power, refers to the electricity consumed by a power supply unit (PSU) when it is plugged in but not actively powering a device, such as when a computer is turned off or in a low-power state, like sleep mode. This small, continuous draw (often a few watts) occurs due to background functions, such as maintaining standby rails (e.g., +5VSB for wake-on-LAN). Lower vampire power is better, as it reduces energy waste and lowers electricity costs.
Vampire power is low.
The Cybenetics report indicates that this power supply is compliant with ATX 3.1; however, the transient testing results show issues on the 3.3 V rail.
Could you clarify how ATX 3.1 pass/fail determinations are defined in your methodology? Specifically, how are transient deviations on secondary rails, such as the 3.3 V rail, evaluated when concluding overall ATX 3.1 compliance?
Reference:
Cybenetics ATX 3.1 PASS Report
https://www.cybenetics.com/evaluations/psus/2971/
Which transient response results are you referring to? The transient response tests with normal loads, which I do, and without capacitors? These are my tests; they are not included in any ATX spec. I have been conducting these for many years now, and they are there to compare all PSUs with load on all rails directly.
The ATX v3.1 uses an entirely different transient response load scheme, which Cybenetics adopts, to check against this standard.
This standard is open, so you can study it and look at what it says about transient report testing.
based on your experience did unicon caps was better than toshin kogyo or similar with nippon chemicon, rubycon or nichicon ?
I don’t think they are better than the well-known caps, especially the last three brands you mention.
so it’s basically same tier as TK ?
I don’t have a clue unless I check enough capacitors from Unicon and TK
Interestingly, SAMA P uses a different RSY platform and shows excellent results.
Hi, Aris, do you have any idea why BeQuiet lists Cybenetics Gold efficiency and Noise A+ in its marketing materials, when all Pure Power 13 M PSUs achieved Platinum and A++?
Did they change anything after your tests or why?
They can always downgrade the badges, but never upgrade them.
…they certainly can, but what’s the point, from a marketing point of view,
…probably none.
Maybe they’re not sure about the manufacturing tolerances, who knows 👀