Corsair RM850x ATX v3.1 PSU Review

Efficiency Normal, Light & Super-Light Loads

Efficiency is decent at normal loads and high enough at light and super-light loads.

Average Efficiency

The unit’s average efficiency is clearly within the range of the Cybenetics Gold level, actually close to the top limits, which are 89% for 115V and 91% for 230V.

Average PF

The APFC converter performs well.

Average Efficiency 5VSB

The 5VSB rail is highly efficient.

Vampire Power

Vampire power is low.

Pages ( 7 of 11 ): « Previous123456 7 891011Next »

Related Posts

8 thoughts on “Corsair RM850x ATX v3.1 PSU Review

  1. Thank you for the review, Aris. I can’t decide which PSU to buy, the Corsair RM850x (2024) or the Super Flower Leadex VII XG 850W. They are both at the same price in my country. Which one do you think is the better one and you would take?

  2. Another hardware site, LTT, mentions that the previous version doesn’t have UVP but instead “CFP”? Corsair mentions this has UVP (as required by ATX specification), and I was wondering if you test for that?

  3. This PSU was the worst I’ve bought over 20 years of building PC’s every few years. The cables smelled of cheap plastic, and the unit itself let off a nasty burnt cable smell, neither of which dissipated away after running it for 3 days under a ventilator. Sent it back to the shop, hopefully getting a refund. Not buying corsair PSU’s anymore for a long time.

      1. I sent it for RMA, they replaced it, just now opened the replacement box, the same nasty smell is on the cables on a brand new unit. Won’t even bother installing it, this time will make sure to ask for a refund.

  4. Hey Aris, thank you for the review. After my long research and your articles, I finally bought this product (it finally arrived in my country). Is it a problem if the 3.3V channel drops below 3.2? If it is a problem, what causes it?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *