Relative Perf & Perf Per Watt (Raytracing + DLSS/FSR + FG)
- Alan Wake II
- Avatar: Frontiers of Pandora
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Hogwarts Legacy
- Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart
There is a 5% performance difference at HD and close to 3% at QHD, always in favor of the previous Windows update version.
HD (1920 x 1080)
QHD (2560 x 1440)
UHD (3860 x 2160)
Pages:
These tests make no sense. You’ve invalidated them by not using like-for-like drivers. You’re not so much comparing windows as you are comparing driver configurations
No sense to you probably.
The performance difference between driver versions can be upwards of 10%. This test is worthless.
Show me your results proving that! That the OVERALL difference can be 10% between 3-4 month driver versions! Your comment is totally useless without proof!
i think your test have problem
you test on old , modify 23h2 not new defult windows iso ( you change many settings before )
you must instal new 23h2 publish 1 year ago , rathen test and will see 20% performance on 24h2
other thing , you must run game on 1080 medium quality (cpu heavy) not ultra max settings (gpu heavy)
i like see this test on AMD GRAPHIC CARD , i am sure when amd cpu ,gpu give more performance / price
Haha wait your saying they should test an un optimised install from a year ago? Which all gamers would have installed not tweaked to the best it can be?
that doesn’t make any sense.!