Relative Perf & Perf Per Watt (Raytracing + DLSS/FSR)
- Alan Wake II
- Black Myth Wukong
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Dragon Age: The Veilguard
- Forza Motorsport
- Indiana Jones and the Great Circle
- Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart
- Resident Evil 4
FHD (1920 x 1080)
 |
 |
There is a significant performance difference at FHD and with both RT and DLSS enabled. However, the 5070 Ti surpasses the competition in performance per watt due to its lower power consumption at FHD.
QHD (2560 x 1440)
 |
 |
The performance gap is 6.2% at QHD with the 5070, and there is also a 3% loss in performance per watt improvement.
UHD (3860 x 2160)
 |
 |
The 4080 is 5.3% better in performance, and almost equal in performance per watt, at UHD.
Pages:
- Prologue & Technical specifications
- NVIDIA’s Key Technologies
- Box & Contents
- Part Analysis
- Specifications Comparison
- Test System
- Game Benchmark Details
- Raster Performance
- RT Performance
- RT Performance + DLSS/FSR Balanced
- Raytracing Performance + DLSS/FSR Balanced + FG
- DLSS/FSR Balanced (No RT)
- DLSS/FSR Balanced + FG (No RT)
- Relative Perf & Perf Per Watt (Raster)
- Relative Perf & Perf Per Watt (Raster + DLSS/FSR)
- Relative Perf & Perf Per Watt (RT)
- Relative Perf & Perf Per Watt (RT + DLSS/FSR)
- Relative Perf & Perf Per Watt (RT + DLSS/FSR + FG)
- Rendering Performance
- Operating Temperatures
- Operating Noise & Frequency Analysis
- Power Consumption
- Clock Speeds & Overclocking
- Cooling Performance
- Epilogue
Thanks for your detailed review. I bought a similar Galax card called the Blade OC in China. Despite putting it to the same settings as you in GPU tweak (and the GPU clock dial even going slightly higher to 2997) I’m finding that the max core clock I can get in TimeSpy Extreme GT1 is just under 3000MHz. Do you think this is just silicon lottery because my card seems to be about 3-5% behind every review of the Galax One click OC I can find (can’t read Chinese reviews of the local Blade OC version)?
Hi! OC is pure silicon lottery I am afraid.
OK. Cheers.