Relative Perf & Perf Per Watt (Raster + DLSS/FSR)
- Assassin’s Creed Mirage
- Starfield
- The Last of Us Part I
- Warhammer 40000: Space Marine 2
FHD (1920 x 1080)
 |
 |
The difference with the 4080 is 5% at FHD, while the performance per watt is slightly higher for the 5070 Ti.
QHD (2560 x 1440)
 |
 |
At QHD, the RTX 5070 is about 3% lower than the RTX 4080. The difference in performance per watt is notable at 8.7% in 5070 Ti’s favour.
UHD (3860 x 2160)
 |
 |
The difference with the RTX 4080 is low at UHD, with the performance per watt boost exceeding 12%.
Pages:
- Prologue & Technical specifications
- NVIDIA’s Key Technologies
- Box & Contents
- Part Analysis
- Specifications Comparison
- Test System
- Game Benchmark Details
- Raster Performance
- RT Performance
- RT Performance + DLSS/FSR Balanced
- Raytracing Performance + DLSS/FSR Balanced + FG
- DLSS/FSR Balanced (No RT)
- DLSS/FSR Balanced + FG (No RT)
- Relative Perf & Perf Per Watt (Raster)
- Relative Perf & Perf Per Watt (Raster + DLSS/FSR)
- Relative Perf & Perf Per Watt (RT)
- Relative Perf & Perf Per Watt (RT + DLSS/FSR)
- Relative Perf & Perf Per Watt (RT + DLSS/FSR + FG)
- Rendering Performance
- Operating Temperatures
- Operating Noise & Frequency Analysis
- Power Consumption
- Clock Speeds & Overclocking
- Cooling Performance
- Epilogue
Thanks for your detailed review. I bought a similar Galax card called the Blade OC in China. Despite putting it to the same settings as you in GPU tweak (and the GPU clock dial even going slightly higher to 2997) I’m finding that the max core clock I can get in TimeSpy Extreme GT1 is just under 3000MHz. Do you think this is just silicon lottery because my card seems to be about 3-5% behind every review of the Galax One click OC I can find (can’t read Chinese reviews of the local Blade OC version)?
Hi! OC is pure silicon lottery I am afraid.
OK. Cheers.