Performance – Max & Speed Percentage
Max RPM, CFM, Pressure & Power
The maximum speed is notably lower than that of the previous model, but airflow and static pressure are notably improved. This clearly shows that the new design is more efficient.
10 – 100% Fan Speed Percentage
Since most fan control ICs don’t apply precisely the percentage of RPM speed that you want (e.g., 50% PWM for a 2000 RPM fan should be 1000 RPM), I used to find the fan’s maximum speed and then dial directly the fan speeds that corresponded to 10%, 20%, and so on of its maximum rated speed. I decided to stop doing that. So from now on, in all of my fan evaluations, I will dial the corresponding PWM value in 10% steps to also check how accurate its fan controller is, and for my noise results to align with the airflow and static pressure results from the Longwin apparatus, where I don’t use RPM but PWM control for all testing.
Thanks for the review. I was particularly interested in how the Noctua NF A12x25 G2 compared to the XPG Nidec Vento Pro 120 PWM, since the XPG compared pretty well to the Phanteks T30-120. To my surprise it didn’t compare that well with the Noctua with respect to static pressure. Then I noticed that the values for static pressure of the XPG in the normalized noise comparison graphs for the Noctua are substantially lower than in the original test for the XPG and in the normalized noise comparison graphs for the Phanteks. E.g.: Original test @ 25 dBA: 1.92 mmAq, Noctua comparison graph @ 25 dBA: 1.68 mmAq.
If the values for static pressure in the Noctua comparison graphs are correct, the performance of the XPG drops considerably compared to the original test.
Can you explain what happened here?
It’s a one-trick pony fan IMO. It’s a quiet fan but that’s all it has to offer. Just performance-wise, it’s in the middle of the pack with focus on low noise performance… however at that level of low RPM, they would all perform more/less the same with maybe 1 or 2C delta in real world. On the otherhand, T30 performs well at low noise but also has the ability to scale up to insane level if one desires that destroys even the Noctua Industrial fan, thus killing 2 birds with one stone.
The performance of the Arctic P12 Pro is outstanding!
Is there any reason to buy the Noctua NF-A12x25 G2, given that the Arctic fan is much cheaper and better?
In my country, the P12 Pro costs just 5.66 euro, whereas the NF-A12x25 G2 costs 28.59 euro. The Noctua fan is five times more expensive than the Arctic fan, and it is underperforming in static pressure tests.
Also, I have no idea why the P12 Pro is so cheap right now.
Even if it’s one of the best 25mm fans, other options perform very similar to it (Toughfan 12 Pro and P12 Pro as mentioned) and if you have room for 28-30mm you have even more options
Makes me curious to see what Noctua could achieve with 28 or 30mm, especially on the 140mm G2 version. Thermalright released some 28mm versions of 25mm fans and by specs it’s roughly 10% better on both airflow and pressure, guess I’ll just keep dreaming of a 140x30mm fan that is 15-20% better than the G2 lol. Thanks for the review as always!
Thanks, great review. Fan looks very premium but 30+ dollars for 1 fan, damn I feel poor. Thankfully I don’t like low noise fans I prefer the loudest that exist so everything is very cheap in that range.