Arctic did it Again! Dropping the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K Temperatures >5°C with An Offset Mounting

Normalized Noise Tests

For these tests, I set the cooler’s fan(s) to speeds with noise output at the following predefined levels: 20/25/30/35/40 dBA. I skip the corresponding tests if the cooler’s fan(s) cannot reach some noise levels. Finally, I include a test where the cooler’s fan(s) spins at full speed.

Intel Results

CPU Temperature

The temperature differences are high with the offset contact frame. It is not as high as the claimed 7 degrees Celsius but close enough to 5C. Nevertheless, temperatures don’t reveal the whole truth, so let’s check the average CPU frequencies!

CPU Frequency

The differences in CPU frequencies increase as the cooler’s fans spin faster. So, the operating temperatures are lower, and the average CPU clocks also increase!

CPU Wattage

The CPU’s power consumption is slightly lower with the offset contact frame. Still, it is over 300W on all tests.

Cooler Exhaust Temperature

I measure the temperature at the radiator’s exhaust side in AIOs.

Pages ( 4 of 6 ): « Previous123 4 56Next »

Related Posts

4 thoughts on “Arctic did it Again! Dropping the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K Temperatures >5°C with An Offset Mounting

      1. the father of the idea of offset mounting is Noctua, but their processes take a long time, so I’m curious if and when they will come up with it for LGA 1851…
        I guess that other Asian competitors will overtake them now

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *