Transient Response
20% Load – 20ms
| Voltage | Before | After | Change | Pass/Fail |
| 12V | 12.076V | 11.844V | 1.92% | Pass |
| 5V | 5.028V | 4.915V | 2.25% | Pass |
| 3.3V | 3.340V | 3.197V | 4.28% | Pass |
| 5VSB | 5.083V | 5.035V | 0.95% | Pass |
50% Load -20ms
| Voltage | Before | After | Change | Pass/Fail |
| 12V | 12.054V | 11.948V | 0.88% | Pass |
| 5V | 5.024V | 4.911V | 2.26% | Pass |
| 3.3V | 3.340V | 3.191V | 4.45% | Pass |
| 5VSB | 5.053V | 4.999V | 1.06% | Pass |
Transient response at 12V is not among the best in this category. You cannot call it mediocre, but it is not great. This is because of the increased voltage drop during the 20% transient response test, where the PSU’s resonant controller operates in PWM mode.
Transient Response ATX v3.0 Tests
The PSU successfully passed all ATX v3.0 transient response tests.
Pages:
it looks good. Thanks
Why no inclusion of other atx 3 psus you tested like Msi etc? This doesn’t seem best way to inform users
Different categories, the MSI unit I reviewed is digital and more expensive. I also try to keep the graphs small enough for mobile browsing. I can input 200x PSUs if I wanted, but the graphs wouldn’t be usable.