Advertised Vs. Real Performance
Read the updated review on this product here: Seasonic Magflow 120mm Cooling Fan Review – ReCheck!
Advertised Vs. Real Performance:
- Max Speed (RPM): 2000 / 2038
- Max Input Current (A): 0.1 / 0.15
- Qmax (CFM): 63.33 / 62.52
- Pmax (mmAq): 2.61 / 2.39
- Max Noise Level (dBA): 33.78 / 37.7
Seasonic is honest since the advertising specs are close to the real ones. Only noise output is a bit way, but I don’t know the noise measurement they followed.
Pages:
Would you consider adding noise-normalized charts? I think it would be really helpful metric to compare fans with. That way fans can’t just brute-force their way to the top of a chart.
New review has them included 🙂
One minor issue. The max power chart seems backwards. It says higher is better. With power consumption, lower is better.
The data is great though.
Fixed that in the new review, thank you! Noticed it too before I post it (Phanteks review). So many graphs, so much data, so little time 🙁
Finally, quick connect fans that are black and no RGB!!
Short warranty though compared to competition.
Would you consider testing servers as well? There is a huge difference between advertised vs real performance regarding acoustic noise. Just one exemple, Dell PowerEdge T350: advertised between 31 – 40 dBA (depending on configuration, entry, typical, feature rich) vs. real 48-50 dBA at only 65% PWM 3480 RPM (mesured with SoundMeter app on Samsung Galaxy S10e). This server cooling design relies on only one 92x92x38mm Delta AFC0912DE fan with great performance (160CFM @ 6000 RPM), but with great noise too, 63 dBA…
If someone sents me these parts, why not. My Longwin can go up to 250CFM and 100mmAq of static pressure.